An overview of the "Allah controversy"

Summary: Following a brief review of the current crises arising from a controversial Government ban on the use of the term ALLAH by non-Muslims, and ensuing court proceedings, this article quotes several responses from leaders in Sabah and Sarawak in addition. The spirit and letter of the Malaysia Agreement should not be forgotten in order to have full perspective in the debate. Possible repercussions in international relations and image are outlined, with particular reference to Indonesia. The article proposes major steps to restoring inter-religious harmony, beyond judicial decisions. In conclusion, writer appeals to a return to shared core values of all major religions.


There has not in my memory of recent history anywhere in the world where the word used to refer to God has given rise to such national controversy and attracted international attention. Against the backdrop of social change and political tension, Malaysia has gained an unenviable World First, a national passion promoted under the Mahathir regime.

Close on the heels of the 50th Anniversary of the Malayan Independence, a ban was gazetted by the Government for non-Muslims on Malaysia to use the term Allah in reference to God. The Government move was rather perplexing, saying that use of the Arabic word might offend the sensitivities of Muslims who make up 60% of Malaysia's 28 million population.

The ban was however overturned in court on December 31st, 2009, enraging certain sections of Muslims aligned to the ruling UMNO party. The High Court said it was the constitutional right for the Catholic newspaper, the Herald, to use the word "Allah". The Herald had faced the prospect of indefinite ban from publication for using the term Allah.

Protesters against the court ruling have apparently received implicit and explicit encouragement from statements of a few Federal Government Ministers and the decision of the Home Ministry to appeal against the High Court ruling. The Home Minister has in a rare departure from previous practice, granted permit for a mammoth demonstration by protestors; it has always been the contention by Malaysian Government that public demonstrations are “not our culture” and threaten public order. However, on the eve of the large demonstration,
the PM, the Home Minister and the Police (IGP) are reportedly making some conflicting and rather confusing statements.

The controversy is thus set to escalate. If of any help, the court has granted a government application for stay of execution of the High Court ruling pending the outcome of the Appeal by the Home Ministry, this consented to by the Catholic side.

For one, the former prime minister, Mahathir, said that the word Allah belongs to the Muslims, whereas the current PM is notably “uncommitted” on the matter. In sharp contrast, Mahathir’s activist daughter, Marina, says “It is not about God belonging to you, rather YOU belong to God.” She says that the constant battle for ownership of God is in quite wrong.

It is generally the contention of Government and some others that sections of the Muslim population in Malaysia would be easily confused over the usage of “Allah” by non-Muslims, insinuating that churches have used this as an excuse to convert Muslims out of their faith.

Mahathir further said that the term Allah may be used in such a way that could inflame the anger of Muslims, or in his own words, “they may use it on banners or write something that might not reflect Islam”, a statement condemned by Dr. Lim Teck Ghee et al. as wholly unworthy of the former PM.

TG Lim, in 2 separate articles at the Centre for Policy Initiatives website, reported in some detail the mass mobilization against the High Court ruling that has already spread to cyberspace in quite an alarming way in tandem with inciteful and intimidating articles in an UMNO controlled newspaper.

In a strident rebuke head on, an UMNO veteran, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah says,” Umno is digging itself into an intolerant hardline position that has no parallel that I know of in the Muslim world.-- and the government it leads is taking up policy lines based on “sensitivities” rather than principle. The issue appears to be more about racial sentiment than religious, let alone constitutional principles.-- A nation is made up of citizens bound by a shared conception of justice and not of mobs extracting satisfaction for politicised emotional states.--Malaysia is a federation of sovereign entities, --it has come to be run habitually as a unitary state. We have to learn again how to be a federation.”(Concerns about federalism in the context of the “Allah debate” is also echoed by Sabah and Sarawak political leaders quoted later.)

“The Bible has been using Allah for hundreds of years, ever since they translated the Bible into Bahasa Malaysia/Indonesia. In fact, we have copies of a Bahasa-translated Bible published 200 years ago that used Allah”, says RPKamarudin. This being so, and surely for the 50 years of Malayan Independence, there has not been a significant exodus of Malaysian Muslims to embrace Christianity as this is legally not possible in Malaysia, in spite of constitutional provisions of religious freedom.

RPK says further, “The word ‘Allah’ existed before the word ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islam’.--- Muhammad the son of Abdullah –(or) ‘Muhammad the son of the Servant of Allah’ long before the Revelation when he ‘became’ a Muslim.” How do the Muslims (meaning Malays) explain this if they say that Allah belongs to the Muslims?” Thus RPK deduces that the term Allah would have been used by Pagan Arabs before the time of Prophet Mohammed, Praise be to His Name.

Those aligned to the Federal Opposition, Pakatan Rakyat, generally believe that the gazetted ban on non-Muslim use of “Allah” is a concoction of the UMNO-led Federal Government to project its Islamic image to Malay Muslims, and politically out-manoeuvre the Islamist PAS in the opposition Pakatan (Alliance). It is perceived that in face of the ban and the following controversy, the Malay Muslim base of PAS and possibly Parti KeAdilan Rakyat, would be eroded to the advantage of UMNO.

Pakatan Rakyat parties have come out in consistent support of the High Court ruling, based on fundamental Islamic teachings.

The Leader of the Federal Opposition, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, had also quoted an influential world Islamic cleric, Sheihk Dr.Yusof Al Qaradawi, as saying that there is no problem with Christians referring to God as Allah.
Tok Guru Nik Aziz, the PAS Menteri Besar of Kelantan had before the court ruling said that he did not oppose the Catholic Herald using the word ALLAH.

PAS issued a statement in prompt agreement with the High court: “it is consistent with the federal Constitution and Islamic principles”and that “based on Islamic principles, the use of the word Allah by the people of the Abrahamic faiths such as Christianity and Judaism, is acceptable” .--“PAS strongly objects to any aggressive and provocative approach that can lead to tension in society,” it is quoted.
In a measured response a day after the PAS statement, an official spokesman of Parti Keadilan Rakyat says "the wish of the non-Muslims to call their God Allah is a positive turn of events and should respectably be recognized. -- There is no necessity for any faction in society to take advantage of the current circumstances and turn the dispute into a narrow political propaganda.”
But far-reaching political ramifications are unavoidable. “-- the political and economic costs for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's administration will linger for much longer--- a significant setback to the central theme of his new administration — the “1 Malaysia” policy which is designed to bring the country's multiracial and multi-religious communities together, “ a Straits Times article quite accurately describes the political fall out.

It is clear that 1Malaysia mantra is also taking direct hits, in Sabah and Sarawak as much, or even more than in KL. Over 40% of the people of Sarawak are Christians, and a roughly similar proportion in Sabah, the majority being indigenous peoples.

1Malaysia will face a severe predicament as the Appeal Court is widely expected to reverse the High Court decision. In appeasing an arguably large Muslim constituency in Peninsular Malaysia, such a court reversal would adversely affect the Christians in Sabah and Sarawak. Both sides of the political divide will undoubtedly interpret the electoral significance of the issue on both sides of the South China Sea.

A senior Sabah Christian member of the Cabinet, Tan Sri Bernard Dompok, made an oblique comment favouring the continued use of the term “Allah”, suggesting that the use of “Allah” follows from the widespread use of the Malaysian national language. “The Sabah communities have always used Bahasa Melayu as it is the regional lingua franca and Christianity has been in Sabah since 1881,” the Plantations Industry and Commodities minister is quoted as saying.

In Sarawak, the sole KeAdilan State legislator, Dominique Ng (Padungan), has called on government to respect the ruling. Ng, a Buddhist himself, asks the government to explain why it may not now release all of the confiscated religious articles to the churches and individuals concerned. He refers to the reported confiscation in Kuching on September 15th 2009 ---of 15,000 imported copies of Bibles bearing the word ALLAH, and quoted other instances of confiscation of Christian articles. (Writer: In view of the stay of execution of the High Court ruling, the ban obviously remains in force.)

Ng said, “--that leading Muslim clerics and so many Malaysian Muslims are so religiously principled in their stand in sharing the use of the term ALLAH, is indeed a defining moment in Malaysian communal relations. -- the Barisan National would be well advised to embrace rather than resist through another court challenge and thus seeming to encourage other acts stoking social tension.”

“ This is indeed a litmus test of 1Malaysia. The Prime Minister should let Malaysians be ONE in the belief of God and Allah, a ONENESS which will be promoted using a shared term ALLAH, blessed be His Name ! ”

“ Sarawak Government should ---reassure all Sarawak Christians of their rights under the Malaysia Constitution and the Spirit of the Malaysia Agreement,” says Ng. Under the Malaysia Agreement in 1963, Sarawak and Sabah people have greater space for religious freedom in spite of Islam being constitutionally defined as national religion.
Sarawak KeAdilan chairman, Baru Bian, declared that there “is no place for religious extremists and religious bigots in this country, as we are a nation of varied religious beliefs and practices. --Cobbold Commission Report clearly recorded that ‘freedom to profess, practice and propagate any religion’ should be guaranteed-- that ‘Sarawak should be a secular state. This is the reason I believe that today Sarawak remains as such without any official state religion.”
Dr. John Anthony Brian of Sarawak, wrote on his blog, “For Sabah and Sarawak we are watching UMNO reaction carefully. We fully understood PAS and PKR stance on the issue now. UMNO should be able to manage their response in the most sensitive manner to the feeling of non- Muslim too.” “As natives of Sabah and Sarawak, as “pribumi” of Malaysia with Christianity as our religion we can also exercise our rights to organize protest over ABIM / PKPIM protest. But where will this road lead us to?” he retorted, referring to planned protest demonstrations in KL against the High Court ruling.
This writer had written in his blog in April 2009, a related article “Sugguh Besar Allahku” based on an Indonesian hymn bearing that title translated as “Glory be to God.”
I wrote further, “--an Iban (Dayak) showed me the the first lines of the Genesis in the Iban bible where clearly the word Allah was used from the very beginning that the Iban Bible was published (add: about a century ago). -- the implications of such a legal ban on the word Allah, for Christians in Malaysia using the local language Bible. Enormous distress, to say the least.” Thus the majority of the indigenous Christians, not knowledgeable in English or Chinese, would not have any Bible which they can use, this an intolerable infringement on their constitutional rights on freedom of worship.
I further pointed out that an Indonesian Christian would be banned from bringing the Indonesian language Bible into Malaysia for personal use or as gift to a Malaysian Christian friend, and for that matter any other Arab Christian carrying an Arabic Bible into Mallaysia.
The international relations repercussions from the ban should be anticipated. The battered image of Malaysia overseas will be dealt more blows in both the Western and the Islamic countries. Malaysia would be singularly out of step with the rest of the Muslim world, often described as Ummah, by banning non-Muslims from using the term Allah; this a highly arrogant move against learned and authoritative Muslim sources locally and overseas.
The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) commends the landmark ruling by a Malaysian Court on December 31, 2009, that affirms the religious freedom of Malaysian Christians. –“We call on the Malaysian government to uphold the religious freedom of Christians and to let the court ruling stand. We also urge Muslim NGOs to respect Islamic teachings and long-held Islamic traditions, and to withdraw their opposition to the use of the word “Allah” by their Christian compatriots,” its statement reads.
Malaysian authorities have clearly ignored the scenario that the gazetted ban may have extended repercussions beyond its own Christian and Muslim citizenry.
News of the controversy is already widely reported by the media worldwide. “Prime Minister Najib Razak called the A-word controversy a “sensitive issue” -- What a disappointment for a man who ran for office promising to create “One Malaysia,” writes the Wall Street Journal.
Significant damage may also result from the controversy in relations with the Indonesian people; Indonesia is the largest Muslim nation, with growing clout on the regional stage given historical, cultural and geo-political realities. Imported Malay language Bibles are from Indonesia; banning implies that what is acceptable to Islam in Indonesia is not to the government of Malaysia. What this arrogance would do to the recently bruised relations with the major ASEAN partner remains to be seen. Other ASEAN neighbours would surely not welcome any unnecessary strain on inter-state relations by a quirk issue.
There has to be a way out of this serious impasse threatening harmony, beyond the decisions of civil courts.
The people in Sabah and Sarawak may arguably be exempted from the ban on the basis of the Malaysia Agreement, but this would be a 2Malaysia solution, surely welcome by Sabah and Sarawak Christians but perhaps unacceptable nationally.
Writer believes it is the duty of responsible government to work on a couple of fronts:
1. Political. The crises is widely believed to have political partisan origin. The partners, other than UMNO, in the 13 party BN (national front) coalition should have their voices heard on the issue, however feeble, especially the BN partners in Sabah and Sarawak. Federal BN rules by virtue of support of BN partners in Sabah and Sarawak, so the leverage by the latter may not be that weak! The folly of the ban should be admitted.
There should be an all- party (including Pakatan) round-table to desist from further using the issue to partisan political advantage, but this contingent on the following.
2. Community. Rather than holding mass demonstrations, community confidence-building forums should by held, organized by government and civil society.

3. Inter-Religious Dialogue. This is perhaps the most crucial in influencing positive or negative development in other areas. Top religious leaders of Muslim, Christian churches, perhaps other religions, should sit and agree to a joint position which will guide community, political parties, government and perhaps courts.
Lawyer Azril Mohd Amin, writing at Malaysia Insider, called for mediation as an instrument of conflict resolution, this synonymous with the above dialogue proposal.
” The Catholic Church --has expressed its willingness to engage in dialogue with the Muslim clergy and find an amicable solution to the Allah row currently threatening—“ reports MKini news-portal. This is a reassuring development which writer hope and believe the Islamic clergy will respond favourably to, in genuine and respected Islamic traditions .

Concluding this review, and lest it be forgotten, may I share with readers :

“The great faiths, and would one dare to say scientific non-theist faith, are Divine gifts to humanity, different in form to suit different cultures, at different times of history. They are however very similar in substance, in the shared core values of love and humanity, and they should be universally shared in the globalised confluence of digital age civilisation.

That apparent differences in faiths may not lead god-created communities, and indeed the entire world, to self-destruction in nuclear-age conflicts, but that the shared universal values be the driving force bonding humankind, divinity and divine-created Planet Earth.” (Being Easter reflections April 2009 on my blog.)

May God Allah be praised!

Time Sarawak has Health Services Management School

NEED FOR SETTING UP SCHOOL OF HEALTH SERVICES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT IN SARAWAK.

Dr. Francis H. H. Ngu, , M.B.,B.S.(Malaya), M.H.P.(UNSW)

AUG.2009.

“--- in an advanced nation as we aspire to be, there should not only be expensive top end medical technologies and services available for the elite few, but there should also be accessible and equitably distributed medical care –“

“A Keadilan government, genuine about human capital development, will positively engage with the medical and allied professional stakeholders, and health related NGO reps, in medical services development; we maintain that getting competent professional advice in public decision making will reduce the chance of large scale public policy and project failures.” YB Dominique Ng, ADUN Padungan, extract of speech in DUN.

SUMMARY:

In the general context of high complexity and rising national health care costs, Sabah and Sarawak will need a large injection of public sector funding for new facilities and upgrades to achieve a “catch-up growth”. The disparity of service provision between E. and Peninsular Malaysia, and the growing accessibility problem following Privatisation Policy, aggravated in face of a stalled economy, need to be addressed by government. The public interests in medical care in Sarawak has been largely canvassed by a single political party, but in the last 2 years receiving some limited bipartisan support.

Devolvement and decentralization as part of needed structural reform was stated, (but left to future discussion).

In anticipation of the needs outlined, the implementing capacity of government must be beefed up quickly by training a body of health services planning and management professionals of multi-professional backgrounds. It is suggested that such a school be set up, at relatively low cost, to benefit the State and nation. The new HSM profession will help better inform political leaders and the wider community in the much needed dialogue on health care and social welfare issues in the decades to come.

FULL TEXT

That no nation has it absolutely right attests to the complexity of providing health care services to nation states. USA spends double digits of its GDP on Health, but has been struggling with reforms even as you read this, as Obama tries to provide universal coverage for a large section of the lower socio-economic groups left out under market mechanisms. UK has its well established NHS, very tightly rationed, partly through GPs as controlling “gatekeepers.” Australia provides high quality universal coverage to its citizens at high costs, but not without funding constraints and deficiencies in practitioner

supply to rural and remote areas. The “socialist market economics” which power the rest of the Chinese economy, has left the greater part of the population not covered to receive affordable medical care.

Medical care is human resource and technology intensive, subject to great flux in a social-political environment undergoing ever more rapid change. The multi-disciplinary high-knowledge personnel teams have to be optimally engaged to deliver patient-care individual and community outcomes.

Health services delivery, based on whichever international models, has proven to constitute an increasingly larger part of the GDP. In Malaysia the public and private combined outlay of just under 4% of GDP is relatively low compared to some western nations. However domestic political and health care policy re-orientation in Malaysia may see the share by Health in the public sector jump by 50-100% in the medium term. The increased supply of Medical graduates at around 3000 a year nationally, will further create its own demands and in its wake, rising national health care costs, a sequel predictable by health care economics.

The health care needs and deficits of Sabah and Sarawak are quite staggering, as we have outlined in “Time to review medical care services in Sarawak”, which we went to press in April, 2008 and which we canvassed again in August 2008 (1):

“-----reiterating the following proposals:

1. Sibu, Miri and later Bintulu should be upgraded to Regional Referral Hospital status, providing a wider range specialist and sub-specialist services in 5-10 years, such as psychiatry ,cancer, cardiology, nephrology, urology, burns among others.
2. A few other divisional hospitals need to be upgraded to general hospitals with 5-6 basic specialist services, as expressed initially by Parti Keadilan Rakyat and later the BN MPs of Sarikei, Limbang and Kapit. The Sri Aman, Lubok Antu and Saribas population has also long been underserved.
3. State Government, Federal and Education Ministries must urgently and jointly address health services manpower issues, in view of the enormous upgrading of health services due to the people of Sarawak.
4. Attention should be paid to health services planning and management training to policy level, necessitated by a newly arising scenario of bipartisan recognition of the need to address severe medical care services deficiency.
5. There needs to be a systematic devolvement of decision making authority and responsibilities from central government to state government if the medical care needs of Sarawak were to be met in the decades ahead.”

“Parti Keadilan leaders in Kuching had during the 2006 State general elections campaign, called for the building of 3 standard polyclinics and 3 general hospitals around the growing Kuching metropolis within the next 10 years or so. They are to serve residents of Petra Jaya-Santubong, Pending-Samarahan-Asajaya and Batu Kawa-Padawan-Mambong respectively. Planning should start soonest—“ (1)

It is evidently clear that the medical care agenda is so massive that even if the present MOH planning and management machinery were to move entirely from KL to Kuching, it can barely cope with the needs of Sarawak, not to mention Sabah as well. Even the proposed second hospital for Kuching, whether new or converted from SIMC, will prove an enormous stress to the manpower capacity of the Ministry for the subsequent 3-5 years. (2)

Catch-up growth in the public health sector is mandated by both the disparity of development between Peninsular and E. Malaysia, and also by a large hiatus due to sharply reduced public sector health care infrastructural development as a result of the wider government Privatisation policy of the Mahathir era.

Large scale privatization of medical care replacing public sector financing is hazardous politically even with a highly robust and broad middle class economy; the ills are becoming increasingly apparent for a nation facing economic stagnation since the Asian Crises of 1997, increased income and social inequality and a drop in real disposable incomes as a result of world-wide inflation. Private and individual financing for medical care is feasible for some 20% of Malaysians nationwide, but even less for Sabah and Sarawak. Holding back public sector funding will prove more and more politically untenable for government. Sooner rather than later, this has to be a bipartisan recognition of the political realities of Health Care.

To meet the health service planning and management demands of the needed catch-up growth, the 2 East Malaysian states, with also the highest population growth among the states, must urgently develop their full health services planning and management competencies, this reasonably achievable within 5 years.

The jury may still be out on whether health care is economically productive, but to leave the planning and management of health care without the contribution from the disciplines of public policy, health economics, accountancy, general and business management, health and social statistics, engineering, architecture and design among others, would be irresponsible and even catastrophic. The current Sarawak International Medical Centre fiasco is a case in point.

The health services planning and management field (H.P./ H.S.M.) attempts to forge a multi-disciplinary approach to the optimal delivery of modern health care, including public health and epidemiology, social science, economics and accountancy, general management, demography, law and ethics, media and communications, research science among others, and aided by IT. Major fields of learning and related professions provide a facilitatory and enabling structural and management framework for the medical, nursing and allied professionals to apply best practice evidence-based medicine to patient care. Some of our finest professionals should be called to contribute to health care, which is challenging us with advancing new technology, rapidly rising costs and difficult bioethical issues.

The health service management professional may be trained through a diploma course or as a primary degree undergraduate course, or be drawn from other established professions like medicine, nursing, public administration, economics and management through a (post)graduate programme. Accreditation as a HSM professional would follow training specified by a profesional accreditation agency. Italics (2).

Malaysian central planning and educational authorities are lagging in awareness of the field of health services management (HSM). Limited exposure to planning and management is provided in the Master of Public Health programmes at local universities, rightly reflecting the over-riding importance of tropical communicable diseases before morbidity from lifestyle changes and the explosion of medical technology set in.

A couple of medical officers are sent overseas to do Dip. Hospital Administration or graduate H.P./HSM programmes annually. Their subsequent input into the health system is however curtailed by structural arrangements.

On return, they are appointed either as Hospital Directors or as officers in the Planning Department of the Ministry of Health in Kuala Lumpur. The Planning Department is however a misnomer, for it does not deal with the whole range of national health policy, structural issues, health service financing or holistic planning, but rather it engages in newly approved physical facilities and their design; even this, it is deficient in the post-commissioning evaluative phase processes which are invaluable in influencing subsequent physical projects.

Sarawak would make a national contribution if it were to start a School of Health Services Management, at Diploma, undergraduate and graduate levels in conjunction with reputable overseas partners, as are found at a couple of Australian universities.

The cost of setting up is rather minimal, as only small lecture rooms and tutorial rooms are needed, and much academic material may be sourced online. The greater operational costs relate to academic staffing and resource library. However a small to modest annual outlay of around RM$10 million is needed initially. The sum pales in comparison to the RM$350 million spent on the Sarawak International Medical Centre project, a giant fiasco which would have been wholly avoidable had the protagonists been exposed to proper professional HP/HSM advice.

The financial investment is small, but the returns to health care management and health sector efficiency and effectiveness would be enormous. HP and HSM training must proceed, notwithstanding the health care model adopted. It may be crucial to the long-term success of inevitable health care structural reform for Sarawak and Malaysia in future; it would greatly help the further development of both the public and the private health care sectors, including future health tourism ambitions as part of the services economy. Professionalism will be greatly enhanced at all levels from policy makers at national and state levels to middle rung managers of hospitals, large polyclinics, and local divisional and district health management. Italics (2)

There will be developed a common language to help bridge the communications gap between the medical and nursing professions with legislators, NGOs, political leaders, managers and administrators from other professions. Other professional fields engaged extensively with Health Care would also be duly benefited, these as the wider social spin-offs which are only partly tangible.

Certain basic principles will also be imparted to political leaders as reference points on which to base their political platforms in relation to health care policies. Among others, these relate to resource allocation issues, health services financing, evaluation of new technology, HRM in Health, quality assurance, etc.

A new core of HSM professionals will be borne to replace the only 3 Sarawak-borne doctors who benefited from such training, and all of whom have reached retirement age. There is need for a much larger group drawn from various professions, in addition to medical, who will articulate policy, needs, values, reforms, process and outcome issues,

and take a lead role in steering the health care delivery of Sarawak for the new century.

The emergence of a professional group will guide discussion of a range of health and social welfare issues and thus also help promote meaningful community participation and input into future health care and social welfare policies.

1 Ngu, F.H.H., ” Rational Medical Care Planning”, press-release Kuching, 7th Aug. 2008.

2. This author, in a discussion paper, unpublished, “A structural framework for DECENTRALISING MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES for SARAWAK.’

Harnessing the talent in Pakatan

A statement of concern for the "Dearth of talent in PKR--" by Muaz Omar has appeared 0n the Malaysian Insider blog today. PKR may count itself lucky to be singled out among Pakatan parties, or for that matter all other parties for criticism; it challenges PKR national leadership to conduct its own assessment of the truth or otherwise of the writer's assertion.

While one can fairly easily dispute Omar's contention, one may more critically question Keadilan if it has adequately and optimally harnessed available talent in the party. I think there are qualified people in numerous professional fields, business people and experienced NGOs among its membership nationwide, many of them, thuough second to Khalid Ibrahim's profile, have not emerged to the front at this stage of the struggle. Nor should all of them be in the frontline in future; it is however of critical importance for them to begin playing co-ordinated supportive roles to Pakatan/Keadilan legislators, even in the backrooms.

Even in the late- on- board East Malaysia, among its indigenous leadership there are a couple of PhDs., MBAs, lawyers and medical doctors, and numerous other graduates. A few newly retired civil servants of profile may also be in the pipeline. These would be readily overwhelmed by highly qualified professionals among the membership in Peninsular Malaysia, though some more would be undoubtedly welcome.

It has to be appreciated that many young professionals with high "market worth" would hardly think it a wise choice career-wise to join a movement which in its heydays was lambasted by some for its determined presence on the streets. To most of the middle and upper middle class,an association with the "Reformasi " mould was just not "in". Even if they did come in, professionals may not generally be the ones most effective in mobilising the masses in the all important electoral battles past, present and to come.

Going forward it may be time for the party to start co-ordinating its intellectual base and harnessing their full potential for the better governance of future federal and state governments.

And here it is for management consultants, such as Muaz, to contribute. Correct me, if with my meagre experience in human resource management, if I were to recommend the following basic measures to the party for a start:

1. Start a HR electronic databank for the party, separate registers for Diploma, degree, masters and PhD; electronic sorting by public-sector or business and industry experience or both should be possible, among other characteristics ;

2. An HRM national team of the party to identify key people for designated public policy areas;

3. Assigning public policy teams to State Excos, related shadow cabinet, and other state and federal YBs;

4. Public policy ad-hoc briefings, seminars, work camps for shadow cabinet and Pakatan legislators (could BN legislators be invited too?);

5. Public forums on public policy for confidence building by Pakatan parties

A voluntary contribution from Muaz and others would be undoubtedly welcome by the party.

Francis Ngu,
MBBS (Mal.), MHP(UNSW)